• Admin Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Faculty of Science and Engineering
    • Faculty of Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Faculty of Science and Engineering
    • Faculty of Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of WIRECommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsTypesJournalDepartmentPublisherThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsTypesJournalDepartmentPublisher

    Administrators

    Admin Login

    Local Links

    AboutThe University LibraryOpen Access Publications PolicyDeposit LicenceCOREWIRE Copyright and Reuse Information

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Peer marking of formative assignments

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    In 4 Iain Coleman (final inc. ...
    Size:
    71.15Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Authors
    Coleman, Iain
    Issue Date
    2001
    Submitted date
    2006
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    A first year module within the Biomedical Sciences Module portfolio, BM1119 Human Physiology serves as a core module to introduce students to the key concepts of this discipline as a prelude to later more advanced studies in physiology. As part of the delivery of the topic, students are required to undertake four items of practical work in Human Physiology, which serve to address practical skills in human physiological investigation as well as to underpin theoretical content of the module. Of these four items, the first exercise is assessed formatively and the remaining three are assessed summatively, thereby contributing to the module assessment. The current practice is that all work is marked by the staff. The module has a heterogenous population of approximately 200 students. In consequence, there is heavy workload on staff, which slows turnaround time and delays important feedback to students. This compounds the problem of students over-exaggerating the value of the practical report in this module and spending excessive amounts of time on the practical report to the detriment (in the module team’s view) of other work on the module. This project sought to improve feedback on practical reports by enhancing the students’ comprehension of the assessment process and the feedback applied to an assignment. Improvement in subsequent practical reports was one anticipated and immediate consequence of the project. A secondary outcome was an overall improvement in module overall pass rate. Saving of staff time and acceleration of turnaround time were also anticipated.
    Citation
    CELT Learning and Teaching Projects 2000/2001
    Publisher
    University of Wolverhampton
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2436/6085
    Additional Links
    http://www.wlv.ac.uk/celt
    Type
    Chapter in book
    Language
    en
    Description
    CELT Project on changing practice through innovation and research
    ISBN
    095421160X
    Collections
    Faculty of Science and Engineering

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.