Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThelwall, Mike
dc.contributor.authorKousha, Kayvan
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-05T09:29:33Zen
dc.date.available2016-04-05T09:29:33Zen
dc.date.issued2015-12-18
dc.identifier.issn1468-4527
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/OIR-06-2015-0190
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/604444
dc.description.abstractPurpose A number of subject-orientated and general websites have emerged to host academic resources. It is important to evaluate the uptake of such services in order to decide which depositing strategies are effective and should be encouraged. Design/methodology/approach This article evaluates the views and shares of resources in the generic repository Figshare by subject category and resource type. Findings Figshare use and common resource types vary substantially by subject category but resources can be highly viewed even in subjects with few members. Subject areas with more resources deposited do not tend to have higher viewing or sharing statistics. Practical implications Limited uptake of Figshare within a subject area should not be a barrier to its use. Several highly successful innovative uses for Figshare show that it can reach beyond a purely academic audience. Originality/value This is the first analysis of the uptake and use of a generic academic resource sharing repository.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limited
dc.subjectFigshare
dc.subjectscientometrics
dc.subjectaltmetrics
dc.titleFigshare: A universal repository for academic resource sharing?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalOnline Information Review
dc.date.accepted2015-12-01
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-20T14:39:14Z
html.description.abstractPurpose A number of subject-orientated and general websites have emerged to host academic resources. It is important to evaluate the uptake of such services in order to decide which depositing strategies are effective and should be encouraged. Design/methodology/approach This article evaluates the views and shares of resources in the generic repository Figshare by subject category and resource type. Findings Figshare use and common resource types vary substantially by subject category but resources can be highly viewed even in subjects with few members. Subject areas with more resources deposited do not tend to have higher viewing or sharing statistics. Practical implications Limited uptake of Figshare within a subject area should not be a barrier to its use. Several highly successful innovative uses for Figshare show that it can reach beyond a purely academic audience. Originality/value This is the first analysis of the uptake and use of a generic academic resource sharing repository.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Figshare Results v7r1g preprint.pdf
Size:
1.067Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record