Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSutton, Raul
dc.contributor.authorJamieson, Allan J.
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-12T17:33:30Z
dc.date.available2009-02-12T17:33:30Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationWavelength 4(1): 4-5
dc.identifier.issn1745-8447
dc.identifier.issn1745-8455
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/49005
dc.descriptionOpen access online journal.
dc.description.abstractThe burgeoning activity in forensic science in universities continues to attract criticism. A positive aspect is the potential to inject a much-needed boost to research in all forensic practices. Only recently has fingerprinting, for example, been exposed to rigorous scientific examination and, to a great extent, been found wanting as regards its science – probability apparently has no place in fingermark examination. In response to the opportunity The Forensic Institute brought together representatives from more than 40 UK universities to discuss how this new resource, academics and students, could be used to further research in the forensic sciences. It was envisaged that many casework-related problems, such as environmental frequencies of trace evidence, could be best accomplished by a lot of small student projects coordinated on a national and perhaps international level by a steering group. This steering group in turn would be part of an integrated research strategy developed in conjunction with practitioners. A virtuous cycle of practice, research, development, and practice would be the outcome. And so, in 2004, The Forensic Institute Research Network (FIRN) was born.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherYork: Physical Sciences Centre, The Higher Education Academy
dc.subjectForensic Institute Research Network (FIRN)
dc.subjectFIRN
dc.subjectForensic science
dc.subjectEvidence
dc.subjectCriminal evidence
dc.subjectCriminology
dc.subjectCollaborative working
dc.subjectHigher education
dc.subjectCollaborative learning
dc.titleThe Forensic Institute Research Network.
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalWavelength
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-20T16:07:08Z
html.description.abstractThe burgeoning activity in forensic science in universities continues to attract criticism. A positive aspect is the potential to inject a much-needed boost to research in all forensic practices. Only recently has fingerprinting, for example, been exposed to rigorous scientific examination and, to a great extent, been found wanting as regards its science – probability apparently has no place in fingermark examination. In response to the opportunity The Forensic Institute brought together representatives from more than 40 UK universities to discuss how this new resource, academics and students, could be used to further research in the forensic sciences. It was envisaged that many casework-related problems, such as environmental frequencies of trace evidence, could be best accomplished by a lot of small student projects coordinated on a national and perhaps international level by a steering group. This steering group in turn would be part of an integrated research strategy developed in conjunction with practitioners. A virtuous cycle of practice, research, development, and practice would be the outcome. And so, in 2004, The Forensic Institute Research Network (FIRN) was born.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
news4w1_final.pdf
Size:
232.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Sutton FIRN 2008

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record