A comparison of two stretching modalities on lower-limb range of motion measurements in recreational dancers.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractMost stretching techniques are designed to place a "stress" on the musculoskeletal unit that will increase its resting length and range of motion (ROM). Twenty-four adolescent dancers participated in a 6-week intervention program that compared low-intensity stretching (Microstretching) with moderate-intensity static stretching on active and passive ranges of motion. Microstretching is a new modality that reduces the possibility of the parasympathetic system being activated. Repeated measures analysis indicated changes in ROM over the intervention period (p < 0.05), with the Microstretching group demonstrating greater increases in passive and active ROM than the static stretch group (p < 0.01); there was no noted bilateral differences in ROM. The results from this study agree with past studies that have found that stretching increases the compliance of any given muscle and therefore increases the range of motion. One main finding of the present study was that throughout a 6-week training program very-low-intensity stretching had a greater positive effect on lower-limb ROM than moderate-intensity static stretching. The most interesting aspect of the study was the greater increase in active ROM compared to passive ROM by the Microstretching group. This suggests that adaptation has occurred within the muscle itself to a greater extent than in structures of the hip joint. Practical application for this technique suggests it is beneficial as a postexercise modality that potentially has a restorative component.
CitationA comparison of two stretching modalities on lower-limb range of motion measurements in recreational dancers. 2009, 23 (7):2144-8 J Strength Cond Res
JournalJournal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association
CollectionsSport, Exercise and Health Research Group
- A comparison of strength and stretch interventions on active and passive ranges of movement in dancers: a randomized controlled trial.
- Authors: Wyon MA, Smith A, Koutedakis Y
- Issue date: 2013 Nov
- The Influence of Two Stretching Techniques on Standing Hip Range of Motion.
- Authors: Lobel EE
- Issue date: 2016 Mar
- Effect of stretching duration on active and passive range of motion in the lower extremity.
- Authors: Roberts JM, Wilson K
- Issue date: 1999 Aug
- Effect of foam rolling and static stretching on passive hip-flexion range of motion.
- Authors: Mohr AR, Long BC, Goad CL
- Issue date: 2014 Nov
- A comparison of assisted and unassisted proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques and static stretching.
- Authors: Maddigan ME, Peach AA, Behm DG
- Issue date: 2012 May