A comparison of strength and stretch interventions on active and passive ranges of movement in dancers: a randomized controlled trial.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe majority of stretching interventional research has focused on the development of a muscle's passive range of movement (PROM). Active range of movement (AROM) refers to the functional range of movement (ROM) available to the participant and provides a better insight into the relationship between muscular antagonistic pairings. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of 3 strengthening or stretching interventions on hip and lower limb active (AROM) and passive (PROM) ranges of movement. Thirty-nine female dance students (17 ± 0.52 years; 61.7 ± 8.48 kg; 164.4 ± 5.49 cm) volunteered. They were randomly divided into 3 groups, strength training (n = 11); low-intensity stretching (n = 13); moderate-intensity or high-intensity stretching (n = 11). Four dancers withdrew during the study. All groups carried out a 6-week intervention. The strength training group focused on end of range hip flexor strength; the low-intensity and moderate-intensity stretch group carried out a series of stretches at 3/10 and 8/10 perceived exertion, respectively. Active range of movement and PROM were measured preintervention and postintervention using 2-d video analysis. Repeated measures analysis indicated that although all 3 groups improved their PROM during the experimental period (range increase: 9-200 p < 0.01), no significant differences were found between the groups. For AROM, both the strength training and the low-intensity stretch groups revealed significant improvements in ROM (range increase: 20-300) compared with the moderate-intensity or high-intensity stretch group (p < 0.01). The present data show that interventions based on strengthening agonist muscles or decreasing the resistance of antagonist muscles through low-intensity stretching are beneficial in the development of both active and passive ranges of movement and provide functional training techniques that are often over looked in favor of the more conservative moderate-intensity stretching programs.
CitationA comparison of strength and stretch interventions on active and passive ranges of movement in dancers: a randomized controlled trial. 2013, 27 (11):3053-9 J Strength Cond Res
PublisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
JournalJournal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association
- A comparison of two stretching modalities on lower-limb range of motion measurements in recreational dancers.
- Authors: Wyon M, Felton L, Galloway S
- Issue date: 2009 Oct
- Chronic flexibility improvement after 12 week of stretching program utilizing the ACSM recommendations: hamstring flexibility.
- Authors: Sainz de Baranda P, Ayala F
- Issue date: 2010 Jun
- The Influence of Two Stretching Techniques on Standing Hip Range of Motion.
- Authors: Lobel EE
- Issue date: 2016 Mar
- A randomized controlled trial for the effect of passive stretching on measures of hamstring extensibility, passive stiffness, strength, and stretch tolerance.
- Authors: Marshall PW, Cashman A, Cheema BS
- Issue date: 2011 Nov
- A comparison of assisted and unassisted proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques and static stretching.
- Authors: Maddigan ME, Peach AA, Behm DG
- Issue date: 2012 May