• Admin Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing
    • Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing
    • Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of WIRECommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsTypesJournalDepartmentPublisherThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsTypesJournalDepartmentPublisher

    Administrators

    Admin Login

    Local Links

    AboutThe University LibraryOpen Access Publications PolicyDeposit LicenceCOREWIRE Copyright and Reuse Information

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    A comparison of strength and stretch interventions on active and passive ranges of movement in dancers: a randomized controlled trial.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    strength, micro, AROM, PROM.PDF
    Size:
    314.9Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Authors
    Wyon, Matthew A.
    Smith, Anna
    Koutedakis, Yiannis
    Issue Date
    2013-11
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The majority of stretching interventional research has focused on the development of a muscle's passive range of movement (PROM). Active range of movement (AROM) refers to the functional range of movement (ROM) available to the participant and provides a better insight into the relationship between muscular antagonistic pairings. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of 3 strengthening or stretching interventions on hip and lower limb active (AROM) and passive (PROM) ranges of movement. Thirty-nine female dance students (17 ± 0.52 years; 61.7 ± 8.48 kg; 164.4 ± 5.49 cm) volunteered. They were randomly divided into 3 groups, strength training (n = 11); low-intensity stretching (n = 13); moderate-intensity or high-intensity stretching (n = 11). Four dancers withdrew during the study. All groups carried out a 6-week intervention. The strength training group focused on end of range hip flexor strength; the low-intensity and moderate-intensity stretch group carried out a series of stretches at 3/10 and 8/10 perceived exertion, respectively. Active range of movement and PROM were measured preintervention and postintervention using 2-d video analysis. Repeated measures analysis indicated that although all 3 groups improved their PROM during the experimental period (range increase: 9-200 p < 0.01), no significant differences were found between the groups. For AROM, both the strength training and the low-intensity stretch groups revealed significant improvements in ROM (range increase: 20-300) compared with the moderate-intensity or high-intensity stretch group (p < 0.01). The present data show that interventions based on strengthening agonist muscles or decreasing the resistance of antagonist muscles through low-intensity stretching are beneficial in the development of both active and passive ranges of movement and provide functional training techniques that are often over looked in favor of the more conservative moderate-intensity stretching programs.
    Citation
    A comparison of strength and stretch interventions on active and passive ranges of movement in dancers: a randomized controlled trial. 2013, 27 (11):3053-9 J Strength Cond Res
    Publisher
    Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Journal
    Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2436/313440
    DOI
    10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828a4842
    PubMed ID
    23439346
    Type
    Journal article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1533-4287
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828a4842
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • A comparison of two stretching modalities on lower-limb range of motion measurements in recreational dancers.
    • Authors: Wyon M, Felton L, Galloway S
    • Issue date: 2009 Oct
    • Chronic flexibility improvement after 12 week of stretching program utilizing the ACSM recommendations: hamstring flexibility.
    • Authors: Sainz de Baranda P, Ayala F
    • Issue date: 2010 Jun
    • The Influence of Two Stretching Techniques on Standing Hip Range of Motion.
    • Authors: Lobel EE
    • Issue date: 2016 Mar
    • A randomized controlled trial for the effect of passive stretching on measures of hamstring extensibility, passive stiffness, strength, and stretch tolerance.
    • Authors: Marshall PW, Cashman A, Cheema BS
    • Issue date: 2011 Nov
    • A comparison of assisted and unassisted proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques and static stretching.
    • Authors: Maddigan ME, Peach AA, Behm DG
    • Issue date: 2012 May

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.