Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGalasinska, Aleksandra
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-20T18:43:12Z
dc.date.available2008-05-20T18:43:12Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationDiscourse & Society, 17(5): 609-626
dc.identifier.issn09579265
dc.identifier.issn00000000
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0957926506066347
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/27099
dc.description.abstractIn this article I shall explore discursive constructions of ethnicity, and in particular notions of ‘Polishness’, among members of three-generation families living in the Polish town of Zgorzelec, on the border with Germany. The data come from a Europe-wide ethnographic project studying communities living on the borders between the EU and its ascendant nations, funded by the European Commission’s 5th Framework Programme (www.borderidentities.com). The most characteristic feature of the data concerning ethnicity is a clash between my informants’ declared identity (mainly constructed in terms of Polishness) and the constructions of Polishness. Even though the latter is usually described in negative terms, almost all interviewees choose to describe themselves in ethnic terms from the spectrum of labels they have been given. Drawing upon Billig et al.’s (1988) concept of ideological dilemma, I shall argue that the apparent contradiction in my informants’ discourse of identity is a result of two different ideological bases underpinning it: the lived ideology accomplished in their discourse clashes with the intellectual ideology explicitly adopted in their declarations of identity. Finally, I shall discuss this shift in terms of the particular place of residence of the members of Polish community right of the national border. I shall also explore the role of the interviewer in my informants’ discourses of ethnic identity. ‘Insiderness’ and ‘outsiderness’ of the researcher in relation to the community under investigation was perceived as a challenge to a coherence of the narratives and resulted in constant discursive negotiations of my interlocutors’ ‘stories of Polishness’. (Sage Publications)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications
dc.relation.urlhttp://das.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/17/5/609
dc.subjectEthnography
dc.subjectPoland
dc.subjectEthnicity
dc.subjectBorder communities
dc.subjectZgorzelec
dc.subjectEuropean Union
dc.subjectEthnic identity
dc.subjectPolishness
dc.subjectDiscourse
dc.subjectCultural identity
dc.subjectEthnic Other
dc.subjectNationality
dc.titleBorder ethnography and post-communist discourses of nationality in Poland
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalDiscourse & Society
html.description.abstractIn this article I shall explore discursive constructions of ethnicity, and in particular notions of ‘Polishness’, among members of three-generation families living in the Polish town of Zgorzelec, on the border with Germany. The data come from a Europe-wide ethnographic project studying communities living on the borders between the EU and its ascendant nations, funded by the European Commission’s 5th Framework Programme (www.borderidentities.com). The most characteristic feature of the data concerning ethnicity is a clash between my informants’ declared identity (mainly constructed in terms of Polishness) and the constructions of Polishness. Even though the latter is usually described in negative terms, almost all interviewees choose to describe themselves in ethnic terms from the spectrum of labels they have been given. Drawing upon Billig et al.’s (1988) concept of ideological dilemma, I shall argue that the apparent contradiction in my informants’ discourse of identity is a result of two different ideological bases underpinning it: the lived ideology accomplished in their discourse clashes with the intellectual ideology explicitly adopted in their declarations of identity. Finally, I shall discuss this shift in terms of the particular place of residence of the members of Polish community right of the national border. I shall also explore the role of the interviewer in my informants’ discourses of ethnic identity. ‘Insiderness’ and ‘outsiderness’ of the researcher in relation to the community under investigation was perceived as a challenge to a coherence of the narratives and resulted in constant discursive negotiations of my interlocutors’ ‘stories of Polishness’. (Sage Publications)


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record