Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Michael V.
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-15T11:01:32Z
dc.date.available2008-05-15T11:01:32Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationJournal of International Maritime Law, 13(2): 112-124
dc.identifier.issn1478-8586
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/26213
dc.description.abstractComments on the Court of Appeal ruling in R. (on the application of Fogg) v Secretary of State for Defence on whether the wreck of a merchant vessel which had been sunk by German boats should be protected as a designated site under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986. Considers the interpretation of the definition of military service.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLawtext Publishing
dc.relation.urlhttp://direct.bl.uk/bld/PlaceOrder.do?UIN=210070574&ETOC=RN&from=searchenginehttp://www.lawtext.com/lawtextweb/default.jsp?PageID=2
dc.subjectMaritime law
dc.subjectMaritime history
dc.subjectMilitary history
dc.subjectHuman remains
dc.subjectArmed forces
dc.subjectMerchant shipping
dc.subjectWrecks
dc.subjectMilitary service
dc.subjectProtection of Military Remains Act 1986
dc.titleMerchantman or quasi-warship? R v Fogg and Secretary of State for Defence and Short.
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalJournal of International Maritime Law
html.description.abstractComments on the Court of Appeal ruling in R. (on the application of Fogg) v Secretary of State for Defence on whether the wreck of a merchant vessel which had been sunk by German boats should be protected as a designated site under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986. Considers the interpretation of the definition of military service.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record