Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, Carol
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-15T09:42:55Z
dc.date.available2008-05-15T09:42:55Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationIn: Halliday, T.C., Karpik, L. and Feeley, M.M. (Eds), Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, pp 109-150
dc.identifier.isbn1841137677
dc.identifier.isbn9781841137674
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/26155
dc.descriptionThis is a metadata record only. The full text of this book chapter is not available in this repository.en
dc.description.abstractAcross the world political liberalism is being fought for, consolidated and defended. That is the case for nations that have never enjoyed a liberal political society, for nations that have advanced towards and then retreated from political liberalism, for nations that have recently shifted from authoritarian to liberal political systems, and for mature democracies facing terrorism and domestic conflict. This book tests for the contemporary world the proposition that lawyers are active agents in the construction of liberal political regimes. It examines the efficacy of a framework that postulates that legal professions not only orient themselves to a market for their services but can frequently be seen in the forefront of actors seeking to institutionalise political liberalism. On the basis of some 16 case studies from across the world, the authors present a theoretical link between lawyers and political liberalism having wide-ranging application over radically diverse situations in Asia and the Middle East, North and South America, and Europe. They argue that it is not the politics of lawyers alone but the politics of a 'legal complex' of legally trained occupations, centred on lawyers and judges, that drives advances or retreats from political liberalism, that political liberalism itself is everywhere in play, in countries with established democracies and those without liberal politics and that it is now clear that the legal arena is a central field of struggle over the shape of political power. The case studies presented here provide powerful evidence that the nexus of bar and bench in transitions towards or away from political liberalism is a force which has universal application. (Hart)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford: Hart Publishing
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.hartpub.co.uk/books/details.asp?isbn=9781841137674
dc.subjectLegal theory
dc.subjectPolitical liberalism
dc.subjectLegal profession
dc.subjectHong Kong
dc.titleDissolving the People: Lawyers and the Liberal Political Complex in Hong Kong
dc.title.alternativeComparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism
dc.typeChapter in book
html.description.abstractAcross the world political liberalism is being fought for, consolidated and defended. That is the case for nations that have never enjoyed a liberal political society, for nations that have advanced towards and then retreated from political liberalism, for nations that have recently shifted from authoritarian to liberal political systems, and for mature democracies facing terrorism and domestic conflict. This book tests for the contemporary world the proposition that lawyers are active agents in the construction of liberal political regimes. It examines the efficacy of a framework that postulates that legal professions not only orient themselves to a market for their services but can frequently be seen in the forefront of actors seeking to institutionalise political liberalism. On the basis of some 16 case studies from across the world, the authors present a theoretical link between lawyers and political liberalism having wide-ranging application over radically diverse situations in Asia and the Middle East, North and South America, and Europe. They argue that it is not the politics of lawyers alone but the politics of a 'legal complex' of legally trained occupations, centred on lawyers and judges, that drives advances or retreats from political liberalism, that political liberalism itself is everywhere in play, in countries with established democracies and those without liberal politics and that it is now clear that the legal arena is a central field of struggle over the shape of political power. The case studies presented here provide powerful evidence that the nexus of bar and bench in transitions towards or away from political liberalism is a force which has universal application. (Hart)


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record