Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCook, Dee
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-14T09:57:28Z
dc.date.available2008-05-14T09:57:28Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationSocial Policy and Administration, 36(5): 516-531en
dc.identifier.issn01445596
dc.identifier.issn14679515
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1467-9515.00300
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/25906
dc.description.abstractThe process of consultation has become integral to the development, implementation and evaluation of a raft of UK health and social policies. However, the current bewildering patchwork of area–based initiatives means that, in many localities, it is impossible to evaluate the outcomes of particular targeted initiatives, let alone make sense of local planning consultations, Best Value reviews and (multi–agency) service reviews which run concurrently. The cumulative effects of this consultation "overload" threaten to swamp both local authorities and their service users. Consul–tation is itself a crucial yet deeply problematic process. There is an official view which holds that an "old" model of consultation—often tokenistic and unrepresentative—is being replaced with a "new" one. This paper examines and challenges that view in relation to the key policy areas of housing, social services and policing. It also pays particular attention to, and problematizes, the notion of "hard–to–reach groups", which is so dominant in the discourse of consultation. The paper argues that developing appropriate tools and recognizing that consultation is a process—not an event—are essential starting points in addressing these problems. The next step is to reconcile the principles of both evidence–based policy and user–led services into a strategic (and "joined–up") framework. But, when all this is accomplished, we still need to question the political and fiscal contexts in which policy–making takes place and within which the process of consultation is itself bounded.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd.en
dc.relation.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9515.00300en
dc.subjectConsultationen
dc.subjectSocial policyen
dc.subjectHealth policyen
dc.subjectUKen
dc.subjectLocal authoritiesen
dc.subjectHard–to–reach groupsen
dc.titleConsultation for a Change? Engaging Users and Communities in the policy Processen
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalSocial Policy and Administrationen
html.description.abstractThe process of consultation has become integral to the development, implementation and evaluation of a raft of UK health and social policies. However, the current bewildering patchwork of area–based initiatives means that, in many localities, it is impossible to evaluate the outcomes of particular targeted initiatives, let alone make sense of local planning consultations, Best Value reviews and (multi–agency) service reviews which run concurrently. The cumulative effects of this consultation "overload" threaten to swamp both local authorities and their service users. Consul–tation is itself a crucial yet deeply problematic process. There is an official view which holds that an "old" model of consultation—often tokenistic and unrepresentative—is being replaced with a "new" one. This paper examines and challenges that view in relation to the key policy areas of housing, social services and policing. It also pays particular attention to, and problematizes, the notion of "hard–to–reach groups", which is so dominant in the discourse of consultation. The paper argues that developing appropriate tools and recognizing that consultation is a process—not an event—are essential starting points in addressing these problems. The next step is to reconcile the principles of both evidence–based policy and user–led services into a strategic (and "joined–up") framework. But, when all this is accomplished, we still need to question the political and fiscal contexts in which policy–making takes place and within which the process of consultation is itself bounded.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record