Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBasit, Tehmina N.
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-13T10:33:54Z
dc.date.available2008-05-13T10:33:54Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationEducational Research, 45(2):143-154
dc.identifier.issn00131881
dc.identifier.issn14695847
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0013188032000133548
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/25713
dc.description.abstractData analysis is the most difficult and most crucial aspect of qualitative research. Coding is one of the significant steps taken during analysis to organize and make sense of textual data. This paper examines the use of manual and electronic methods to code data in two rather different projects in which the data were collected mainly by in-depth interviewing. The author looks at both the methods in the light of her own experience and concludes that the choice will be dependent on the size of the project, the funds and time available, and the inclination and expertise of the researcher.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content?content=10.1080/0013188032000133548
dc.subjectCoding
dc.subjectQualitative data analysis
dc.subjectData analysis
dc.titleManual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalEducational Research
html.description.abstractData analysis is the most difficult and most crucial aspect of qualitative research. Coding is one of the significant steps taken during analysis to organize and make sense of textual data. This paper examines the use of manual and electronic methods to code data in two rather different projects in which the data were collected mainly by in-depth interviewing. The author looks at both the methods in the light of her own experience and concludes that the choice will be dependent on the size of the project, the funds and time available, and the inclination and expertise of the researcher.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record