Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLane, Andrew M.
dc.contributor.authorBeedie, Chris
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-19T14:36:27Z
dc.date.available2007-07-19T14:36:27Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.submitted2005-05
dc.identifier.citationLane, A.M., Beedie, C.J., & Stevens, M.J. (2005). Mood Matters: A Response to Mellalieu. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17 (4), pp 319-325.
dc.identifier.issn1041-3200
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10413200500313610
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/12843
dc.description.abstractPsychological states such as mood, emotion, and affect have recently received a great deal of attention in the sport psychology literature (Hanin, 2000, 2003; Lane & Terry, 2000; Lazarus, 2000; Mellalieu, 2003). Lane and Terry (2000) proposed a definition of mood and a conceptual model of mood and performance with a focus on depression. Mellalieu (2003) provided detailed commentary and analysis of this work. We argue that although Mellalieu’s paper raised several important and justifiable concerns, in doing so it is arguably moving knowledge in circles rather than forwards. The present paper thus provides a response to Mellalieu’s commentary with reference to recent research.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format.extent61952 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/msword
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10413200500313610
dc.subjectMood
dc.subjectEmotion
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.subjectDepression
dc.titleMood Matters: A response to Mellalieu
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Applied Sport Psychology
dc.source.volume17
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage319
dc.source.endpage325
refterms.dateFOA2020-04-06T15:16:15Z
html.description.abstractPsychological states such as mood, emotion, and affect have recently received a great deal of attention in the sport psychology literature (Hanin, 2000, 2003; Lane & Terry, 2000; Lazarus, 2000; Mellalieu, 2003). Lane and Terry (2000) proposed a definition of mood and a conceptual model of mood and performance with a focus on depression. Mellalieu (2003) provided detailed commentary and analysis of this work. We argue that although Mellalieu’s paper raised several important and justifiable concerns, in doing so it is arguably moving knowledge in circles rather than forwards. The present paper thus provides a response to Mellalieu’s commentary with reference to recent research.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Lane_A.M_et_al_Mood Matters_20 ...
Size:
407.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record