Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorLeonard, Valerie
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-26T14:13:44Z
dc.date.available2007-04-26T14:13:44Z
dc.date.issued1998-09
dc.date.submitted2007-04-26
dc.identifier.issn1363-6839
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/11413
dc.description.abstractThe project which generated this paper arose from continuing concern in the European Union about the persistence of high unemployment and the likely effects of economic reforms in the New Independent States. The study brought together researchers from four countries: Finland and the United Kingdom in the EU and Belarus and Russia in the NIS. The purpose was to examine the impact that differing labour standards in the two NIS countries and the two EU countries have and are likely to have on the ability of companies in each country to compete internationally. The core research activity comprised a small number of in-depth case studies of firms in the fertiliser sector, enabling comparisons to be made between the industries in each of the four countries. The lack of structure of labour markets in the NIS and their comparatively low labour costs posed a potential threat to the competitive position of the EU and this study set out to understand the relevant issues more fully from a number of different perspectives. These included comparing labour costs and productivity, social costs such as health and safety, pensions and other benefits and exploring the impact of investment on productivity. Ultimately the study focused on how a levelling up of labour standards in the NIS would impact on the EU Member States. This paper sets out the findings of the case studies within the fertiliser industries of the respective countries. These specific findings are presented within the general context of a comparison of labour market conditions. The fertiliser industry has been through a period of change in all four countries. Factors which emerge strongly from the research are the differences in health and safety standards and costs and environmental standards and costs between the NIS producers and the EU producers. Productivity also presents a very varied picture, with the NIS producers being disadvantaged by out-dated technology.
dc.format.extent134942 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Wolverhampton
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP 015/98
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.wlv.ac.uk/PDF/uwbs_WP015-98%20Walsh%20Leonard.pdf
dc.subjectNewly Independent states
dc.subjectBelarus
dc.subjectRussian Federation
dc.subjectEuropean Union
dc.subjectLabour standards
dc.subjectCompetition
dc.subjectFertiliser industry
dc.subjectCase study
dc.titleThe effect on international competitiveness of differing labour standards in the fertiliser industry of the NIS and the EU
dc.typeWorking paper
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-20T16:28:09Z
html.description.abstractThe project which generated this paper arose from continuing concern in the European Union about the persistence of high unemployment and the likely effects of economic reforms in the New Independent States. The study brought together researchers from four countries: Finland and the United Kingdom in the EU and Belarus and Russia in the NIS. The purpose was to examine the impact that differing labour standards in the two NIS countries and the two EU countries have and are likely to have on the ability of companies in each country to compete internationally. The core research activity comprised a small number of in-depth case studies of firms in the fertiliser sector, enabling comparisons to be made between the industries in each of the four countries. The lack of structure of labour markets in the NIS and their comparatively low labour costs posed a potential threat to the competitive position of the EU and this study set out to understand the relevant issues more fully from a number of different perspectives. These included comparing labour costs and productivity, social costs such as health and safety, pensions and other benefits and exploring the impact of investment on productivity. Ultimately the study focused on how a levelling up of labour standards in the NIS would impact on the EU Member States. This paper sets out the findings of the case studies within the fertiliser industries of the respective countries. These specific findings are presented within the general context of a comparison of labour market conditions. The fertiliser industry has been through a period of change in all four countries. Factors which emerge strongly from the research are the differences in health and safety standards and costs and environmental standards and costs between the NIS producers and the EU producers. Productivity also presents a very varied picture, with the NIS producers being disadvantaged by out-dated technology.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Walsh & Leonard3.pdf
Size:
131.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record