• Admin Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Faculty of Social Sciences
    • Faculty of Social Sciences
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Faculty of Social Sciences
    • Faculty of Social Sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of WIRECommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsTypesJournalDepartmentPublisherThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsTypesJournalDepartmentPublisher

    Administrators

    Admin Login

    Local Links

    AboutThe University LibraryOpen Access Publications PolicyDeposit LicenceCOREWIRE Copyright and Reuse Information

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Acts of faith: instinct, value and IT investment decisions

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Bannister & Remenyi.pdf
    Size:
    95.47Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Authors
    Bannister, Frank
    Remenyi, Dan
    Issue Date
    2000
    Submitted date
    2007-04-25
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Although well over 1000 journal articles, conference papers, books, technical notes and theses have been written on the subject of information technology (IT) evaluation, only a relatively small subset of this literature has been concerned with the core issues of what precisely is meant by the term 'value' and with the process of making (specifically) IT investment decisions. All too often, the problem and highly complex issue of value is either simplified, ignored or assumed away. Instead the focus of much of the research to date has been on evaluation methodologies and, within this literature, there are different strands of thought which can be classified as partisan, composite and meta approaches to evaluation. Research shows that a small number of partisan techniques are used by most decision makers with a minority using a single technique and a majority using a mixture of such techniques of whom a substantial minority use a formal composite approach. It is argued that, in mapping the set of evaluation methodologies on to what is termed the investment opportunity space, that there is a limit to what can be achieved by formal rational evaluation methods. This limit becomes evident when decision makers fall back on 'gut feel' and other non-formal/rigorous ways of making decisions. It is suggested that an understanding of these more complex processes and decision making, in IT as elsewhere, needs tools drawn from philosophy and psychology.
    Citation
    Journal of Information Technology, 15(3): 231-241
    Publisher
    Palgrave Macmillan
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2436/11368
    DOI
    10.1080/02683960050153183
    Additional Links
    http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713772733~db=all
    Type
    Journal article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    02683962,14664437
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1080/02683960050153183
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Faculty of Social Sciences

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.