Do judges enhance home advantage in European championship boxing?
Abstract
There have been many examples of contentious points decisions in boxing. Professional boxing is scored subjectively by judges and referees scoring each round of the contest. We assessed whether the probability of a home win (and therefore home advantage) increased when bouts were decided by points decisions rather than knockouts. Overall, we found that bouts ending in points decisions had a significantly higher proportion of home wins than those decided by a knockout, though this effect varied across time, and controlling for relative quality of boxers was only effective when using more recent data. Focusing on these data, again the probability of a home win was higher with a points decision and this effect was consistent as "relative quality" varied. For equally matched boxers ("relative quality" = 0), expected probability of a home win was 0.57 for knockouts, 0.66 for technical knockouts and 0.74 for points decisions. The results of the present study lend general support to the notion that home advantage is more prevalent in sports that involve subjective decision-making. We suggest that interventions should be designed to inform judges to counter home advantage effects.Citation
J Sports Sci 2005, 23(4):409-16Publisher
Taylor & FrancisPubMed ID
16089185Type
Journal articleLanguage
enISSN
0264-04141466-447X
Collections
Related articles
- Home advantage in soccer: a retrospective analysis.
- Authors: Pollard R
- Issue date: 1986 Winter
- Game location and officiating bias in English Club Cricket.
- Authors: Jones MV, Bray SR, Bolton L
- Issue date: 2001 Oct
- Home advantage in speed skating: evidence from individual data.
- Authors: Koning RH
- Issue date: 2005 Apr
- Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English Premiership football.
- Authors: Boyko RH, Boyko AR, Boyko MG
- Issue date: 2007 Sep
- Modelling home advantage in the Summer Olympic Games.
- Authors: Balmer NJ, Nevill AM, Williams AM
- Issue date: 2003 Jun