It's not just What you do, it's also the Way that you do it: Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Health Research

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/620959
Title:
It's not just What you do, it's also the Way that you do it: Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Health Research
Authors:
Devonport, Tracey ( 0000-0003-4808-244X ) ; Nicholls, Wendy ( 0000-0002-8623-7986 ) ; Johnston, Lynne H; Gutteridge, Robin ( 0000-0002-1803-3295 ) ; Watt, Angela
Abstract:
Purpose: This paper presents a reflective account of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in the development of obesity and binge eating research. Method: We established Patient Advisory Groups (PAGs) at two English regional National Health Service (NHS) weight management services. PPI was evaluated as follows; (1) PAG members completed a PPEQ, (2) PAG meetings captured group discussion on PPI involvement, (3) practitioner and researchers produced written reflections on PPI, (4) sources one to three were consolidated during reflections that took place via e-mail and telephone correspondence between researchers and practitioners, culminating in a summary SKYPE meeting between one practitioner and one researcher involved in the PAGs. Results: Results in the form of reflections suggest guidelines on undertaking PPI were helpful with regards what to do, but less helpful on how. For example, suggestions for the management of interpersonal factors such as eliciting self-disclosure and managing power differentials are insufficiently addressed in existing guidelines. Conclusions: The present case study illustrated how interpersonal considerations can help or hinder the optimal use of PPI. Recommendations for practitioners and researchers planning PPI are offered.
Citation:
OUP accepted manuscript 2017 International Journal For Quality In Health Care
Publisher:
Oxford Academic
Journal:
International Journal For Quality In Health Care
Issue Date:
Feb-2018
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/620959
DOI:
10.1093/intqhc/mzx177
Additional Links:
http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/pdf/production_in_progress.pdf; https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/issue
Type:
Article
Language:
en
Description:
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in International Journal for Quality in Health Care following peer review. The version of record will be available online at: https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/issue, DOI: 10.1093/INTQHC/MZX177.
ISSN:
1353-4505
Appears in Collections:
FEHW

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorDevonport, Traceyen
dc.contributor.authorNicholls, Wendyen
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Lynne Hen
dc.contributor.authorGutteridge, Robinen
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Angelaen
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-06T14:37:06Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-06T14:37:06Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-
dc.identifier.citationOUP accepted manuscript 2017 International Journal For Quality In Health Careen
dc.identifier.issn1353-4505en
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/intqhc/mzx177-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/620959-
dc.descriptionThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in International Journal for Quality in Health Care following peer review. The version of record will be available online at: https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/issue, DOI: 10.1093/INTQHC/MZX177.en
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This paper presents a reflective account of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in the development of obesity and binge eating research. Method: We established Patient Advisory Groups (PAGs) at two English regional National Health Service (NHS) weight management services. PPI was evaluated as follows; (1) PAG members completed a PPEQ, (2) PAG meetings captured group discussion on PPI involvement, (3) practitioner and researchers produced written reflections on PPI, (4) sources one to three were consolidated during reflections that took place via e-mail and telephone correspondence between researchers and practitioners, culminating in a summary SKYPE meeting between one practitioner and one researcher involved in the PAGs. Results: Results in the form of reflections suggest guidelines on undertaking PPI were helpful with regards what to do, but less helpful on how. For example, suggestions for the management of interpersonal factors such as eliciting self-disclosure and managing power differentials are insufficiently addressed in existing guidelines. Conclusions: The present case study illustrated how interpersonal considerations can help or hinder the optimal use of PPI. Recommendations for practitioners and researchers planning PPI are offered.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford Academicen
dc.relation.urlhttp://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/pdf/production_in_progress.pdfen
dc.relation.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/intqhc/issueen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to International Journal For Quality In Health Careen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectrelational dynamicsen
dc.subjectself-disclosureen
dc.subjectcommunicationen
dc.subjectpatient satisfaction,en
dc.subjectshared decision makingen
dc.subjectqualitative methodsen
dc.titleIt's not just What you do, it's also the Way that you do it: Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Health Researchen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal For Quality In Health Careen
dc.date.accepted2017-12-
rioxxterms.funderInternalen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUoW061217TDen
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0en
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-03-01en
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.