Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: in response to Mike Oliver

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/620529
Title:
Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: in response to Mike Oliver
Authors:
Levitt, Jonathan M.
Abstract:
In his 2013 article in Disability & Society, Oliver recommended that the social model should either be replaced or re-invigorated. I argue here that the social model’s current emphasis reflects the social conditions in which it was introduced, and that the model’s impact on disabled people’s lives would increase if its emphasis was to more accurately reflect the current social conditions in the geographical regions in which it is applied. In order to help foster its re-invigoration, I ask five questions for discussion on the way forward for the social model. I identified my questions through examining published writing on the scope of the social model and on the model’s relationship with other models of disability.
Citation:
Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: in response to Mike Oliver 2017, 32 (4):589 Disability & Society
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Journal:
Disability & Society
Issue Date:
21-Mar-2017
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/620529
DOI:
10.1080/09687599.2017.1300390
Additional Links:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09687599.2017.1300390
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
0968-7599
Appears in Collections:
FOSS

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorLevitt, Jonathan M.en
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-23T14:49:16Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-23T14:49:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03-21-
dc.identifier.citationExploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: in response to Mike Oliver 2017, 32 (4):589 Disability & Societyen
dc.identifier.issn0968-7599en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09687599.2017.1300390-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/620529-
dc.description.abstractIn his 2013 article in Disability & Society, Oliver recommended that the social model should either be replaced or re-invigorated. I argue here that the social model’s current emphasis reflects the social conditions in which it was introduced, and that the model’s impact on disabled people’s lives would increase if its emphasis was to more accurately reflect the current social conditions in the geographical regions in which it is applied. In order to help foster its re-invigoration, I ask five questions for discussion on the way forward for the social model. I identified my questions through examining published writing on the scope of the social model and on the model’s relationship with other models of disability.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09687599.2017.1300390en
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Disability & Societyen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectmodelen
dc.subjectsocial modelen
dc.subjectmodel of disabilityen
dc.subjectemancipatoryen
dc.subjectemancipatory disability researchen
dc.titleExploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: in response to Mike Oliveren
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalDisability & Societyen
dc.date.accepted2017-02-
rioxxterms.funderInternalen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUoW230617JLen
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0en
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-09-21en
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.