A Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships using a Large Internet Sample

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/620430
Title:
A Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships using a Large Internet Sample
Authors:
Lane, Andrew M; Terry, Peter C.; Friesen, Andrew P; Devonport, Tracey J. ( 0000-0003-4808-244x ) ; Totterdell, Peter
Abstract:
The present study tested and extended Lane and Terry’s (2000) conceptual model of mood-performance relationships using a large dataset from an online experiment. Methodological and theoretical advances included testing a more balanced model of pleasant and unpleasant emotions, and evaluating relationships among emotion regulation traits, states and beliefs, psychological skills use, perceptions of performance, mental preparation, and effort exerted during competition. Participants (N = 73,588) completed measures of trait emotion regulation, emotion regulation beliefs, regulation efficacy, use of psychological skills, and rated their anger, anxiety, dejection, excitement, energy, and happiness before completing a competitive concentration task. Post-competition, participants completed measures of effort exerted, beliefs about the quality of mental preparation, and subjective performance. Results showed that dejection associated with worse performance with the no-dejection group performing 3.2% better. Dejection associated with higher anxiety and anger scores and lower energy, excitement, and happiness scores. The proposed moderating effect of dejection was supported for the anxiety-performance relationship but not the anger-performance relationship. In the no-dejection group, participants who reported moderate or high anxiety outperformed those reporting low anxiety by about 1.6%. Overall, results showed partial support for Lane and Terry’s model. In terms of extending the model, results showed dejection associated with greater use of suppression, less frequent use of re-appraisal and psychological skills, lower emotion regulation beliefs, and lower emotion regulation efficacy. Further, dejection associated with greater effort during performance, beliefs that pre-competition emotions did not assist goal achievement, and low subjective performance. Future research is required to investigate the role of intense emotions in emotion regulation and performance.
Publisher:
Frontiers iMedia
Journal:
Frontiers in Psychology
Issue Date:
Mar-2017
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/620430
Additional Links:
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00470/full
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
0160-9009
Sponsors:
ESRC
Appears in Collections:
FEHW

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorLane, Andrew Men
dc.contributor.authorTerry, Peter C.en
dc.contributor.authorFriesen, Andrew Pen
dc.contributor.authorDevonport, Tracey J.en
dc.contributor.authorTotterdell, Peteren
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-24T09:33:28Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-24T09:33:28Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03-
dc.identifier.issn0160-9009en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/620430-
dc.description.abstractThe present study tested and extended Lane and Terry’s (2000) conceptual model of mood-performance relationships using a large dataset from an online experiment. Methodological and theoretical advances included testing a more balanced model of pleasant and unpleasant emotions, and evaluating relationships among emotion regulation traits, states and beliefs, psychological skills use, perceptions of performance, mental preparation, and effort exerted during competition. Participants (N = 73,588) completed measures of trait emotion regulation, emotion regulation beliefs, regulation efficacy, use of psychological skills, and rated their anger, anxiety, dejection, excitement, energy, and happiness before completing a competitive concentration task. Post-competition, participants completed measures of effort exerted, beliefs about the quality of mental preparation, and subjective performance. Results showed that dejection associated with worse performance with the no-dejection group performing 3.2% better. Dejection associated with higher anxiety and anger scores and lower energy, excitement, and happiness scores. The proposed moderating effect of dejection was supported for the anxiety-performance relationship but not the anger-performance relationship. In the no-dejection group, participants who reported moderate or high anxiety outperformed those reporting low anxiety by about 1.6%. Overall, results showed partial support for Lane and Terry’s model. In terms of extending the model, results showed dejection associated with greater use of suppression, less frequent use of re-appraisal and psychological skills, lower emotion regulation beliefs, and lower emotion regulation efficacy. Further, dejection associated with greater effort during performance, beliefs that pre-competition emotions did not assist goal achievement, and low subjective performance. Future research is required to investigate the role of intense emotions in emotion regulation and performance.en
dc.description.sponsorshipESRCen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherFrontiers iMediaen
dc.relation.urlhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00470/fullen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectemotionen
dc.subjectaffecten
dc.subjectconcentrationen
dc.subjectmooden
dc.subjectdepressionen
dc.subjectdejectionen
dc.titleA Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships using a Large Internet Sampleen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Psychologyen
dc.date.accepted2017-03-
rioxxterms.funderESRCen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUoW240317TDen
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0en
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-03-24en
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.