No room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/613863
Title:
No room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research.
Authors:
Newton, Benjamin John; Rothlingova, Zuzana; Gutteridge, Robin; LeMarchand, Karen; Raphael, Jon Howard
Abstract:
We conducted a systematic search of qualitative research into the individual's experience of chronic low back pain. Two reviewers independently read through 740 unique abstracts. Inter-rater reliability was fair. The final sample comprised 19 articles which we critiqued using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. This article focuses on the critical appraisal. Limitations include a lack of an adequate rationale for the theoretical framework, a lack of an account for the decisions made across recruitment and data collection, and a lack of reflexivity. Finally we discuss and offer recommendations for reflexivity and the explication of qualitative methodology in research articles.
Citation:
No room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research. 2012, 17 (6):866-85 J Health Psychol
Publisher:
Sage
Journal:
Journal of health psychology
Issue Date:
Sep-2012
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/613863
DOI:
10.1177/1359105311427615
PubMed ID:
22147063
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
1461-7277
Appears in Collections:
FEHW

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorNewton, Benjamin Johnen
dc.contributor.authorRothlingova, Zuzanaen
dc.contributor.authorGutteridge, Robinen
dc.contributor.authorLeMarchand, Karenen
dc.contributor.authorRaphael, Jon Howarden
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-21T10:59:35Zen
dc.date.available2016-06-21T10:59:35Zen
dc.date.issued2012-09en
dc.identifier.citationNo room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research. 2012, 17 (6):866-85 J Health Psycholen
dc.identifier.issn1461-7277en
dc.identifier.pmid22147063en
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1359105311427615en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/613863en
dc.description.abstractWe conducted a systematic search of qualitative research into the individual's experience of chronic low back pain. Two reviewers independently read through 740 unique abstracts. Inter-rater reliability was fair. The final sample comprised 19 articles which we critiqued using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. This article focuses on the critical appraisal. Limitations include a lack of an adequate rationale for the theoretical framework, a lack of an account for the decisions made across recruitment and data collection, and a lack of reflexivity. Finally we discuss and offer recommendations for reflexivity and the explication of qualitative methodology in research articles.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSageen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Journal of health psychologyen
dc.subjectchronic low back painen
dc.subjectcritical appraisalen
dc.subjectmethodologyen
dc.subjectreflexivityen
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen
dc.subject.meshData Collectionen
dc.subject.meshHumansen
dc.subject.meshLow Back Painen
dc.subject.meshObserver Variationen
dc.subject.meshPatient Selectionen
dc.subject.meshQualitative Researchen
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.subject.meshResearch Designen
dc.subject.meshReview Literature as Topicen
dc.titleNo room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalJournal of health psychologyen

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.