2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/605235
Title:
Guest Editor's Introduction
Authors:
Hambrook, Glyn
Abstract:
The original objective of this themed issue was to gather reflections on the reception of the work of Charles Baudelaire that in some guise or other departed from standard patterns, and, consequently, to focus on Baudelaire’s reception with reference to particularities rather than paradigms. The call for submissions sought therefore to elicit contributions on the reception and translation of Baudelaire’s work in overlooked and under-frequented places, on topics – those which follow were given by way of example in the call for submissions ‒ involving non-standard cultures and patterns of translation of Baudelaire’s work; the reception of Baudelaire’s work in milieus underexplored or ignored by comparative scholarship; and unfamiliar Baudelaire(s): atypical reception of Baudelaire’s work. The four essays and Afterword that comprise this issue achieve this objective in one way or another, while demonstrating that in order to be deemed non-standard, receptions do not have to take the form of dramatic or radical departures from established models of reception. This introduction will provide a context to the essays by considering firstly the recent and current position of reception studies within the context of comparative literature and secondly developments in the study of the reception of Baudelaire during the last few years. It will conclude with a review of the essays and Afterword individually and in relation to each other.
Citation:
Guest Editor's Introduction 2015, 12 (3):283 Comparative Critical Studies
Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
Journal:
Comparative Critical Studies
Issue Date:
Oct-2015
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/605235
DOI:
10.3366/ccs.2015.0174
Additional Links:
http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/ccs.2015.0174
Type:
Other
Language:
en
Description:
Published in Comparative Critical Studies; Volume 12, Issue 3, Page 283-299, ISSN 1744-1854, Available Online October 2015. http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/ccs.2015.0174
ISSN:
1744-1854; 1750-0109
Appears in Collections:
FOSS

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorHambrook, Glynen
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-14T08:49:44Zen
dc.date.available2016-04-14T08:49:44Zen
dc.date.issued2015-10en
dc.identifier.citationGuest Editor's Introduction 2015, 12 (3):283 Comparative Critical Studiesen
dc.identifier.issn1744-1854en
dc.identifier.issn1750-0109en
dc.identifier.doi10.3366/ccs.2015.0174en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/605235en
dc.descriptionPublished in Comparative Critical Studies; Volume 12, Issue 3, Page 283-299, ISSN 1744-1854, Available Online October 2015. http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/ccs.2015.0174en
dc.description.abstractThe original objective of this themed issue was to gather reflections on the reception of the work of Charles Baudelaire that in some guise or other departed from standard patterns, and, consequently, to focus on Baudelaire’s reception with reference to particularities rather than paradigms. The call for submissions sought therefore to elicit contributions on the reception and translation of Baudelaire’s work in overlooked and under-frequented places, on topics – those which follow were given by way of example in the call for submissions ‒ involving non-standard cultures and patterns of translation of Baudelaire’s work; the reception of Baudelaire’s work in milieus underexplored or ignored by comparative scholarship; and unfamiliar Baudelaire(s): atypical reception of Baudelaire’s work. The four essays and Afterword that comprise this issue achieve this objective in one way or another, while demonstrating that in order to be deemed non-standard, receptions do not have to take the form of dramatic or radical departures from established models of reception. This introduction will provide a context to the essays by considering firstly the recent and current position of reception studies within the context of comparative literature and secondly developments in the study of the reception of Baudelaire during the last few years. It will conclude with a review of the essays and Afterword individually and in relation to each other.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEdinburgh University Pressen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/ccs.2015.0174en
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Comparative Critical Studiesen
dc.subjectBaudelaireen
dc.subjectreceptionen
dc.subjecttranslationen
dc.subjectErnest Seillièreen
dc.subjectMario Prazen
dc.subjectToru Dutten
dc.subjectRuth Whiteen
dc.subjectW. T. Bandyen
dc.titleGuest Editor's Introductionen
dc.typeOtheren
dc.identifier.journalComparative Critical Studiesen
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.