University of Wolverhampton
Browse
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses > School of Law, Social Sciences and Communications > School of Legal Studies > Legal Studies Research Group  > Money laundering: from failure to absurdity

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/51153
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!



Title: Money laundering: from failure to absurdity
Authors: Haynes, Andrew
Citation: Journal of Money Laundering Control, 11(4): 303-319
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Journal: Journal of Money Laundering Control
Issue Date: 2008
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/51153
DOI: 10.1108/13685200810910385
10.1108/13685200810910385
Additional Links: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do?contentType=Article&contentId=1752269
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mcb/jmlc/2008/00000011/00000004/art00002
Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the UK law relating to money laundering in the aftermath of the three statutory instruments that came into effect in December 2007. In particular the suitability and impact of the law is considered. Design/methodology/approach – The method adopted is to analyse the current content of the law and consider whether the approach utilised in its drafting will result in the aims behind the law being achieved. Findings – The result of this analysis is to conclude that the law as drafted is not designed in a way that can be effectively applied and that in addition the entire approach is flawed. In particular there are five key areas where problems arise: there is a requirement to report suspicion or knowledge of criminal offences or proposed terrorist acts but not other proposed criminal offences; the requirement to report only relates to information that comes into the reporter’s possession in the course of their trade or profession; the 2007 Regulations create requirements that many of those on whom they are imposed will not be able to effectively apply; the new s.333A appears to limit the offence of tipping off to the regulated sector but will not work as drafted; and in addition there are clear human rights issues associated with the overall regime. Originality/value – This original and topical paper explains the law as it now exists and provides analysis of its impact and undoubted failings.
Type: Article
Language: en
Keywords: Money laundering
UK
Financial regulation
Criminal law
ISSN: 1368-5201
Appears in Collections: Legal Studies Research Group

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.



All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Fairtrade - Guarantees a better deal for Third World Producers

University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY

Course enquiries: 0800 953 3222, General enquiries: 01902 321000,
Email: enquiries@wlv.ac.uk | Freedom of Information | Disclaimer and copyright | Website feedback | The University as a charity

OR Logo Powered by Open Repository | Cookies