|Title: ||The Good, the Bad and the Pacifier: unsettling accounts of early years practice.|
|Citation: ||Journal of Early Childhood Research, 6(2): 145-162.|
|Publisher: ||London: Sage Publications Ltd.|
|Journal: ||Journal of Early Childhood Research|
|Issue Date: ||2008 |
|Additional Links: ||http://ecr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/6/2/145|
|Abstract: ||In this article, interviews with eight managers and questionnaires from 75 practitioners are analysed to explore their perceptions of the role of pacifiers (or dummies) within the nursery. Managers and practitioners source their knowledge from the media, family/friends, and short professional speech and language courses; however, their perceptions of pacifiers derive from mainly contested research that has filtered into the public domain. This creates tensions between perceived parental rights to offer a child a pacifier, current UK guidelines and participants' own, often ambivalent, views. The article engages with Foucauldian concepts to explore how authoritative knowledge filters into everyday practice and to deconstruct relations of power within the early years setting.|
|Appears in Collections: ||Early Years|
|Files in This Item:|
There are no files associated with this item.
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.