Generic behavioural criteria of managerial effectiveness: An empirical and comparative study of UK local government.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/42144
Title:
Generic behavioural criteria of managerial effectiveness: An empirical and comparative study of UK local government.
Authors:
Hamlin, Robert G.; Serventi, Susan A.
Abstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of a “partnership-research” study of effective and ineffective managerial behaviour within the “local government” setting of the Wolverhampton City Council Social Care Department, and to describe how the research supports and challenges the organisation's existing “leadership and management behavioural competency framework”. Additionally, it reveals and discusses the extent to which the results are consistent with equivalent and comparable findings from an equivalent study within a “central government” department. Design/methodology/approach – Concrete examples of effective and ineffective managerial behaviour were collected using the Critical Incident Technique (CIT) of Flanagan, and the obtained data were analysed using content and thematic analytic methods. Findings – The paper finds that from a total of 218 usable critical incidents 50 discrete behavioural items were identified, of which 25 were examples of “effective” and 25 of “ineffective” behaviour. A comparison against equivalent findings from the “central government” study revealed high degrees of overlap with 92 per cent of the “effective” and 96 per cent of the “ineffective” behavioural items being the same as, similar to, or containing some congruence of meaning. Research limitations/implications – Although the number of CIT informants (n=40) falls at the top end of the typical sample range for qualitative research, it is possible that data collection “saturation” has not been reached. Whereas the subject of the present “local government” study was first line and middle managers, the focus of the compared “central government” study also included senior managers. Originality/value – The results of this replica research lend additional empirical support to those who believe in “generic” and “universalistic “ explanations of managerial and leadership effectiveness.
Citation:
Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(4): 285-302
Publisher:
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Journal:
Journal of European Industrial Training
Issue Date:
2008
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/42144
DOI:
10.1108/03090590810871388
Additional Links:
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/03090590810871388
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
03090590
Appears in Collections:
Management Research Centre

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorHamlin, Robert G.-
dc.contributor.authorServenti, Susan A.-
dc.date.accessioned2008-12-10T13:43:45Z-
dc.date.available2008-12-10T13:43:45Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European Industrial Training, 32(4): 285-302en
dc.identifier.issn03090590-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/03090590810871388-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/42144-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of a “partnership-research” study of effective and ineffective managerial behaviour within the “local government” setting of the Wolverhampton City Council Social Care Department, and to describe how the research supports and challenges the organisation's existing “leadership and management behavioural competency framework”. Additionally, it reveals and discusses the extent to which the results are consistent with equivalent and comparable findings from an equivalent study within a “central government” department. Design/methodology/approach – Concrete examples of effective and ineffective managerial behaviour were collected using the Critical Incident Technique (CIT) of Flanagan, and the obtained data were analysed using content and thematic analytic methods. Findings – The paper finds that from a total of 218 usable critical incidents 50 discrete behavioural items were identified, of which 25 were examples of “effective” and 25 of “ineffective” behaviour. A comparison against equivalent findings from the “central government” study revealed high degrees of overlap with 92 per cent of the “effective” and 96 per cent of the “ineffective” behavioural items being the same as, similar to, or containing some congruence of meaning. Research limitations/implications – Although the number of CIT informants (n=40) falls at the top end of the typical sample range for qualitative research, it is possible that data collection “saturation” has not been reached. Whereas the subject of the present “local government” study was first line and middle managers, the focus of the compared “central government” study also included senior managers. Originality/value – The results of this replica research lend additional empirical support to those who believe in “generic” and “universalistic “ explanations of managerial and leadership effectiveness.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/03090590810871388en
dc.subjectBehaviouren
dc.subjectManagerial effectivenessen
dc.subjectIneffectivenessen
dc.subjectEffectivenessen
dc.subjectLeadershipen
dc.subjectManagersen
dc.subjectLocal governmenten
dc.subjectPartnership researchen
dc.titleGeneric behavioural criteria of managerial effectiveness: An empirical and comparative study of UK local government.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalJournal of European Industrial Trainingen
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.