University of Wolverhampton
Browse
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses > Research Institutes > Research Institute in Healthcare Science > Sport, Exercise and Health Research Group > Modeling physiological and anthropometric variables known to vary with body size and other confounding variables

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/35353
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!



Title: Modeling physiological and anthropometric variables known to vary with body size and other confounding variables
Authors: Nevill, Alan M.
Bate, Stuart
Holder, Roger L.
Citation: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 41: 141-153
Publisher: Wiley Interscience
Journal: American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Issue Date: 2005
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/35353
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20356
PubMed ID: 16369959
Additional Links: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/112221246/abstract
Abstract: This review explores the most appropriate methods of identifying population differences in physiological and anthropometric variables known to differ with body size and other confounding variables. We shall provide an overview of such problems from a historical point of view. We shall then give some guidelines as to the choice of body-size covariates as well as other confounding variables, and show how these might be incorporated into the model, depending on the physiological dependent variable and the nature of the population being studied. We shall also recommend appropriate goodness-of-fit statistics that will enable researchers to confirm the most appropriate choice of model, including, for example, how to compare proportional allometric models with the equivalent linear or additive polynomial models. We shall also discuss alternative body-size scaling variables (height, fat-free mass, body surface area, and projected area of skeletal bone), and whether empirical vs. theoretical scaling methodologies should be reported. We shall offer some cautionary advice (limitations) when interpreting the parameters obtained when fitting proportional power function or allometric models, due to the fact that human physiques are not geometrically similar to each other. In conclusion, a variety of different models will be identified to describe physiological and anthropometric variables known to vary with body size and other confounding variables. These include simple ratio standards (e.g., per body mass ratios), linear and additive polynomial models, and proportional allometric or power function models. Proportional allometric models are shown to be superior to either simple ratio standards or linear and additive polynomial models for a variety of different reasons. These include: 1) providing biologically interpretable models that yield sensible estimates within and beyond the range of data; and 2) providing a superior fit based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayes information criterion (BIC), or maximum log-likelihood criteria (resulting in a smaller error variance). As such, these models will also: 3) naturally lead to a more powerful analysis-of-covariance test of significance, which will 4) subsequently lead to more correct conclusions when investigating population (epidemiological) or experimental differences in physiological and anthropometric variables known to vary with body size.
Type: Article
Language: en
Keywords: Ratios
Log-linear regression models
Allometric modelling
Proportionality
Body-size covariates
Heteroscedasticity
MeSH: Anthropometry
Body Constitution
Body Size
Bone Density
Heart
Humans
Metabolism
Models, Biological
Muscles
Respiratory Physiology
ISSN: 0002-9483
Appears in Collections: Sport, Exercise and Health Research Group
Learning and Teaching in Sport, Exercise and Performance

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.



Related articles on PubMed
bullet
Modelling health-related performance indices.
Nevill AM, Holder RL
2000 Nov-Dec
bullet
bullet
bullet
Scaling submaximal exercise cardiac output and stroke volume: the HERITAGE Family Study.
Turley KR, Stanforth PR, Rankinen T, Bouchard C, Leon AS, Rao DC, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Spears FM
2006 Dec
bullet
See all 407 articles

All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Fairtrade - Guarantees a better deal for Third World Producers

University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY

Course enquiries: 0800 953 3222, General enquiries: 01902 321000,
Email: enquiries@wlv.ac.uk | Freedom of Information | Disclaimer and copyright | Website feedback | The University as a charity

OR Logo Powered by Open Repository | Cookies