2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/30414
Title:
Power of source as a factor in deontic inference
Authors:
Kilpatrick, S.G.; Manktelow, Ken I.; Over, D.E.
Abstract:
Power has been studied in various guises in both the social cognition and the reasoning literatures. In this paper, three experiments are reported in which this factor was investigated in the domain of deontic thinking. Power of source of deontic statements was varied within several scenarios, and participants judged the degree to which they thought an injunction would be carried out. In the first experiment, permission statements were used, and it was found that, as predicted, power was positively related to degree of endorsement of deontic conclusions across scenarios. In the second experiment, these findings were generalised across three further deontic domains (threat, warning, and promise) and two different syntactic forms (conjunctive and disjunctive). In the third experiment, the hypothesis that power effects were mediated by subjective judgements of conditional probability was investigated and confirmed. It is argued that these results favour theories that give a general role to probabilistic factors, rather than those based on domain-specific
Citation:
Thinking & Reasoning, 13 (3) : 295-317
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Journal:
Thinking & Reasoning
Issue Date:
2007
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/30414
DOI:
10.1080/13546780601008783
Additional Links:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713685607~db=all
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
13546783; 14640708
Appears in Collections:
Psychology of Health Research Group

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorKilpatrick, S.G.-
dc.contributor.authorManktelow, Ken I.-
dc.contributor.authorOver, D.E.-
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-24T14:27:38Z-
dc.date.available2008-06-24T14:27:38Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationThinking & Reasoning, 13 (3) : 295-317en
dc.identifier.issn13546783-
dc.identifier.issn14640708-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13546780601008783-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/30414-
dc.description.abstractPower has been studied in various guises in both the social cognition and the reasoning literatures. In this paper, three experiments are reported in which this factor was investigated in the domain of deontic thinking. Power of source of deontic statements was varied within several scenarios, and participants judged the degree to which they thought an injunction would be carried out. In the first experiment, permission statements were used, and it was found that, as predicted, power was positively related to degree of endorsement of deontic conclusions across scenarios. In the second experiment, these findings were generalised across three further deontic domains (threat, warning, and promise) and two different syntactic forms (conjunctive and disjunctive). In the third experiment, the hypothesis that power effects were mediated by subjective judgements of conditional probability was investigated and confirmed. It is argued that these results favour theories that give a general role to probabilistic factors, rather than those based on domain-specificen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713685607~db=allen
dc.subjectCognitive Psychologyen
dc.subjectPhilosophyen
dc.subjectThinkingen
dc.subjectReasoning and Problem Solvingen
dc.titlePower of source as a factor in deontic inferenceen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalThinking & Reasoningen
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.