Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses >
School of Health & Wellbeing >
Centre for Health and Social Care Improvement >
Comparing the importance of clinical competence criteria across specialties: impact on undergraduate assessment
this identifier to cite or link
to this item:
|Title: ||Comparing the importance of clinical competence criteria across specialties: impact on undergraduate assessment|
|Citation: ||Physiotherapy, 87 (7): 351-367|
|Issue Date: ||2001 |
|Additional Links: ||http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B7CVK-4H9YR37-3&_user=1644469&_coverDate=07%2F31%2F2001&_rdoc=3&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%2318081%232001%23999129992%23608016%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=18081&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=19&_acct=C000054077&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=1644469&md5=c759d4f0e2c60b2a095f06fd86efd755|
|Abstract: ||Quality measurement in healthcare and higher education indicates the need for a systematic approach to developing undergraduate clinical competence assessment. Validity and reliability may be undermined by differences in assessors' interpretation of what is important. Differing contexts of undergraduates' clinical experience could result in assessors' ratings of activities being deemed less important, omitted or rendered meaningless. This study investigated the level of agreement across and within five clinical specialties in physiotherapy on the relative importance of 89 activities associated with clinical competence. One-way analysis of variance for each activity revealed 12 items differentially rated (p values = 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001). Kendall's coefficient of concordance demonstrated within-group agreement (p = < 0.000). Factor analysis of items upon which there was maximum agreement across specialties, combined with split half reliability analysis (Cronbach's alpha) resulted in eight reliable factors. These included task-specific and generic transferable skills. It was concluded that the factors provided a basis for discussion about clinicians' and academics' contributions to assessment, and a starting point for development of a clinical assessment instrument that could optimise the validity and reliability of clinical assessment decisions.|
|Keywords: ||Clinical Assessment|
|Appears in Collections: ||Centre for Health and Social Care Improvement|
|Files in This Item:|
There are no files associated with this item.
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.