University of Wolverhampton
Browse
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses > Research Institutes > Research Institute in Information and Language Processing > Computational Linguistics Group > Automatic multidocument summarization of research abstracts: Design and user evaluation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/27898
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!



Title: Automatic multidocument summarization of research abstracts: Design and user evaluation
Authors: Ou, Shiyan
Khoo, Christopher S.G.
Goh, Dion H.
Citation: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (10): 1419-1435
Publisher: Wiley
Journal: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Issue Date: 2007
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/27898
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20618
Additional Links: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/114278630/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to develop a method for automatic construction of multidocument summaries of sets of research abstracts that may be retrieved by a digital library or search engine in response to a user query. Sociology dissertation abstracts were selected as the sample domain in this study. A variable-based framework was proposed for integrating and organizing research concepts and relationships as well as research methods and contextual relations extracted from different dissertation abstracts. Based on the framework, a new summarization method was developed, which parses the discourse structure of abstracts, extracts research concepts and relationships, integrates the information across different abstracts, and organizes and presents them in a Web-based interface. The focus of this article is on the user evaluation that was performed to assess the overall quality and usefulness of the summaries. Two types of variable-based summaries generated using the summarization method - with or without the use of a taxonomy - were compared against a sentence-based summary that lists only the research-objective sentences extracted from each abstract and another sentence-based summary generated using the MEAD system that extracts important sentences. The evaluation results indicate that the majority of sociological researchers (70%) and general users (64%) preferred the variable-based summaries generated with the use of the taxonomy.
Type: Article
Language: en
Keywords: Digests
Automatic abstracting
Natural language processing
Text mining
Research abstracts
ISSN: 15322882
15322890
Appears in Collections: Computational Linguistics Group
Computational Linguistics Group

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.



All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Fairtrade - Guarantees a better deal for Third World Producers

University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY

Course enquiries: 0800 953 3222, General enquiries: 01902 321000,
Email: enquiries@wlv.ac.uk | Freedom of Information | Disclaimer and copyright | Website feedback | The University as a charity

OR Logo Powered by Open Repository | Cookies