University of Wolverhampton
Browse
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses > Research Institutes > History and Governance Research Institute > Europe: Trend and Transformation Research Group > The legacy and limitations of Czech purism

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/27104
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!



Title: The legacy and limitations of Czech purism
Authors: Dickins, Tom
Citation: Slavonica, 13(2): 113-133
Publisher: Maney Publishing
Journal: Slavonica
Issue Date: 2007
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/27104
DOI: 10.1179/174581407X228939
Additional Links: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/sla/2007/00000013/00000002/art00002
http://www.maney.co.uk/search?fwaction=show&fwid=214
Abstract: In this article, diachronic and synchronic methods of investigation are combined to evaluate perceptions of lexical borrowing in Czech. The introduction contextualizes the role of purism in the emergence of Czech national consciousness, and highlights the importance of the new linguistic currents in the first quarter of the twentieth century. The main part of the study presents the findings of a detailed survey into attitudes to loanwords and language change, conducted in 2005 on the author's behalf. Wherever possible, the author draws on the methodology and examples of three previous research projects, by Antonín Tejnor (1970), Jiří Kraus (1995) and Silke Gester (2000), in order to maximize the statistical basis for his comparative analysis. The second part of the study considers a list of 540 foreign words, defined as superfluous by František Bartoš and Petr Zenkl in two well known early twentieth-century Czech language manuals. The lexicon compiled from these publications is correlated with data from the latest, authoritative corpus-based frequency dictionary of Czech, Frekvenční slovník češtiny. Although there is some evidence of residual puristic sentiments amongst Czech speakers, the results of part 2 of the study suggest that the prescriptive approach of Bartoš and Zenkl has had little (if any) practical impact on current usage. (Ingenta)
Type: Article
Language: en
Keywords: Czech language
Sociolinguistics
Linguistics
Diachronic forms
Historiolinguistics
Synchronic forms
Lexicography
Loanwords
Purism
Language change
ISSN: 1361-7427
1745-8145
Appears in Collections: Europe: Trend and Transformation Research Group

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.



All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Fairtrade - Guarantees a better deal for Third World Producers

University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY

Course enquiries: 0800 953 3222, General enquiries: 01902 321000,
Email: enquiries@wlv.ac.uk | Freedom of Information | Disclaimer and copyright | Website feedback | The University as a charity

OR Logo Powered by Open Repository | Cookies