University of Wolverhampton
Browse
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses > Research Institutes > History and Governance Research Institute > Europe: Trend and Transformation Research Group > Discoursive strategies for coping with sensitive topics of the Other

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/27098
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!



Title: Discoursive strategies for coping with sensitive topics of the Other
Authors: Galasinska, Aleksandra
Galasinski, Dariusz
Citation: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29(5): 849-863
Publisher: London, Routledge (Taylor & Francis)
Journal: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Issue Date: 2003
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/27098
DOI: 10.1080/1369183032000149604
Additional Links: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content?content=10.1080/1369183032000149604
Abstract: This paper explores border residents' strategies for coping with topics which they perceive as difficult or sensitive in their discourses about people living in such European border locations. Thus we are concerned with the way in which people negotiate accounts of implicit or explicit ethnic conflict, prejudice or negative stereotyping of 'the Other'. We indicate two types of such strategies. First, the strategy of mitigation, in which informants attempt to soften or licence their stereotypical views. Second, we shall discuss a strategy in which mitigation is replaced by the practice of 'oracular reasoning' in our informants' constructions of the ethnic Other; this occurs in those instances when a basic premise is confronted with contradictory evidence, but the evidence is ignored or rejected. The data for our analysis come from 12 border communities in which informants talk about the Other from either across the border, or, in the case of multi-ethnic communities, from within the community itself. We focus upon constructions that purport to give a universal answer to questions of 'what they are like'. Specifically, we explore those constructions where informants have to deal with conflictual voices (either explicit or implicit in the informants' discourse) which question their accounts or contradict the claims they make. Finally, we see the strategies for coping with conflictual accounts of the Other as indicative of the tension between the discursively postulated social/ethnic separation of the border communities and the constructed threat from the Other on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the new and changing public discourse of the Other and the politics underpinning it which goes counter to those more private discourses. (Routledge)
Type: Article
Language: en
Keywords: Border communities
Discourse
Ethnography
Ethnicity
Cultural identity
Oracular reasoning
Disclaimers
Ethnic Other
European Union
Stereotyping
Multi-ethnic communities
Polishness
Sociolinguistics
Minority ethnic groups
Nationality
Ethnic identity
ISSN: 1369183X
14699451
Appears in Collections: Europe: Trend and Transformation Research Group

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.



All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Fairtrade - Guarantees a better deal for Third World Producers

University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY

Course enquiries: 0800 953 3222, General enquiries: 01902 321000,
Email: enquiries@wlv.ac.uk | Freedom of Information | Disclaimer and copyright | Website feedback | The University as a charity

OR Logo Powered by Open Repository | Cookies