University of Wolverhampton
Browse
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses > School for Education Futures > Centre for Developmental and Applied Research in Education (CeDARE) > Learning and Teaching in Higher Education > Does grading method influence honours degree classification?

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/26412
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!



Title: Does grading method influence honours degree classification?
Authors: Yorke, Mantz
Barnett, Greg
Bridges, Paul
Evanson, Peter
Haines, Chris
Jenkins, Don
Knight, Peter
Scurry, David
Stowell, Marie
Woolf, Harvey
Citation: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27 (3): 269-279
Publisher: Routledge (Taylor & Francis)
Journal: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Issue Date: 2002
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/26412
DOI: 10.1080/02602930220138624
Additional Links: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content?content=10.1080/02602930220138624
Abstract: Variation in mark-spread is very evident in degree classification data provided by the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). Previous empirical investigations suggested that, at the level of the module, the spread of results might, in some subjects, be influenced by the method of grading (percentage marking or shorter grade-point scale). The availability of degree classification data from HESA made it possible to test whether the effect perceived at module level carried through to the honours degree classification. The empirically-generated hypothesis was that subjects characterised by a relatively narrow spread under percentage marking would show a wider spread when a grade-point scale of around 20 divisions was used, with the effect being detectable in honours degree classification data. The hypothesis was tested, using HESA data for academic years 1994-95 to 1998-99, on those new universities in England and Wales for which the existence of an institution-wide grading approach could be established. Tests were undertaken at the level of the HESA subject area, and at the more fine-grained level of the individual subject where numbers permitted. Results from the analyses are mixed. The analyses have probably been influenced by weaknesses in the way that HESA has collected award data, but nevertheless suggest lines for further inquiry into a matter that is of importance for equity within institutions (especially where modular schemes are being operated) and more broadly across the higher education sector.
Type: Article
Language: en
Keywords: Mark spread
Degree classification data
Higher Education Statistics Agency
Honours degree classification
New universities in England and Wales
ISSN: 02602938
1469297X
Appears in Collections: Learning and Teaching in Higher Education

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.



All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Fairtrade - Guarantees a better deal for Third World Producers

University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY

Course enquiries: 0800 953 3222, General enquiries: 01902 321000,
Email: enquiries@wlv.ac.uk | Freedom of Information | Disclaimer and copyright | Website feedback | The University as a charity

OR Logo Powered by Open Repository | Cookies