Consultation for a Change? Engaging Users and Communities in the policy Process

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/25906
Title:
Consultation for a Change? Engaging Users and Communities in the policy Process
Authors:
Cook, Dee
Abstract:
The process of consultation has become integral to the development, implementation and evaluation of a raft of UK health and social policies. However, the current bewildering patchwork of area–based initiatives means that, in many localities, it is impossible to evaluate the outcomes of particular targeted initiatives, let alone make sense of local planning consultations, Best Value reviews and (multi–agency) service reviews which run concurrently. The cumulative effects of this consultation "overload" threaten to swamp both local authorities and their service users. Consul–tation is itself a crucial yet deeply problematic process. There is an official view which holds that an "old" model of consultation—often tokenistic and unrepresentative—is being replaced with a "new" one. This paper examines and challenges that view in relation to the key policy areas of housing, social services and policing. It also pays particular attention to, and problematizes, the notion of "hard–to–reach groups", which is so dominant in the discourse of consultation. The paper argues that developing appropriate tools and recognizing that consultation is a process—not an event—are essential starting points in addressing these problems. The next step is to reconcile the principles of both evidence–based policy and user–led services into a strategic (and "joined–up") framework. But, when all this is accomplished, we still need to question the political and fiscal contexts in which policy–making takes place and within which the process of consultation is itself bounded.
Citation:
Social Policy and Administration, 36(5): 516-531
Publisher:
Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Journal:
Social Policy and Administration
Issue Date:
2002
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/25906
DOI:
10.1111/1467-9515.00300
Additional Links:
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/spol/2002/00000036/00000005/art00005; http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1&hid=114&sid=a3554774-1395-44dc-adbe-2894bbc27412%40sessionmgr106; http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/spol
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
01445596; 14679515
Appears in Collections:
Policy Research Institute

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorCook, Dee-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-14T09:57:28Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-14T09:57:28Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Policy and Administration, 36(5): 516-531en
dc.identifier.issn01445596-
dc.identifier.issn14679515-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1467-9515.00300-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/25906-
dc.description.abstractThe process of consultation has become integral to the development, implementation and evaluation of a raft of UK health and social policies. However, the current bewildering patchwork of area–based initiatives means that, in many localities, it is impossible to evaluate the outcomes of particular targeted initiatives, let alone make sense of local planning consultations, Best Value reviews and (multi–agency) service reviews which run concurrently. The cumulative effects of this consultation "overload" threaten to swamp both local authorities and their service users. Consul–tation is itself a crucial yet deeply problematic process. There is an official view which holds that an "old" model of consultation—often tokenistic and unrepresentative—is being replaced with a "new" one. This paper examines and challenges that view in relation to the key policy areas of housing, social services and policing. It also pays particular attention to, and problematizes, the notion of "hard–to–reach groups", which is so dominant in the discourse of consultation. The paper argues that developing appropriate tools and recognizing that consultation is a process—not an event—are essential starting points in addressing these problems. The next step is to reconcile the principles of both evidence–based policy and user–led services into a strategic (and "joined–up") framework. But, when all this is accomplished, we still need to question the political and fiscal contexts in which policy–making takes place and within which the process of consultation is itself bounded.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd.en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/spol/2002/00000036/00000005/art00005en
dc.relation.urlhttp://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1&hid=114&sid=a3554774-1395-44dc-adbe-2894bbc27412%40sessionmgr106-
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/spol-
dc.subjectConsultationen
dc.subjectSocial policyen
dc.subjectHealth policyen
dc.subjectUKen
dc.subjectLocal authoritiesen
dc.subjectHard–to–reach groupsen
dc.titleConsultation for a Change? Engaging Users and Communities in the policy Processen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalSocial Policy and Administrationen
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.