2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/12843
Title:
Mood Matters: A response to Mellalieu
Authors:
Lane, Andrew M.; Beedie, Christopher; Stevens, Matthew
Abstract:
Psychological states such as mood, emotion, and affect have recently received a great deal of attention in the sport psychology literature (Hanin, 2000, 2003; Lane & Terry, 2000; Lazarus, 2000; Mellalieu, 2003). Lane and Terry (2000) proposed a definition of mood and a conceptual model of mood and performance with a focus on depression. Mellalieu (2003) provided detailed commentary and analysis of this work. We argue that although Mellalieu’s paper raised several important and justifiable concerns, in doing so it is arguably moving knowledge in circles rather than forwards. The present paper thus provides a response to Mellalieu’s commentary with reference to recent research.
Citation:
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17(4): 319-325(7)
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Issue Date:
2005
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/12843
Additional Links:
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/uasp/2005/00000017/00000004/art00005
Submitted date:
2005-05
Type:
Article
Language:
n/a
ISSN:
10413200
Appears in Collections:
Sport Performance

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorLane, Andrew M.-
dc.contributor.authorBeedie, Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Matthew-
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-19T14:36:27Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-19T14:36:27Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.date.submitted2005-05-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17(4): 319-325(7)en
dc.identifier.issn10413200-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/12843-
dc.description.abstractPsychological states such as mood, emotion, and affect have recently received a great deal of attention in the sport psychology literature (Hanin, 2000, 2003; Lane & Terry, 2000; Lazarus, 2000; Mellalieu, 2003). Lane and Terry (2000) proposed a definition of mood and a conceptual model of mood and performance with a focus on depression. Mellalieu (2003) provided detailed commentary and analysis of this work. We argue that although Mellalieu’s paper raised several important and justifiable concerns, in doing so it is arguably moving knowledge in circles rather than forwards. The present paper thus provides a response to Mellalieu’s commentary with reference to recent research.en
dc.format.extent61952 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/msword-
dc.language.ison/aen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/uasp/2005/00000017/00000004/art00005en
dc.subjectMooden
dc.subjectEmotionen
dc.subjectPerformanceen
dc.subjectDepressionen
dc.titleMood Matters: A response to Mellalieuen
dc.typeArticleen
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.