The effect on international competitiveness of differing labour standards in the fertiliser industry of the NIS and the EU

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/11413
Title:
The effect on international competitiveness of differing labour standards in the fertiliser industry of the NIS and the EU
Authors:
Walsh, Kenneth; Leonard, Valerie
Abstract:
The project which generated this paper arose from continuing concern in the European Union about the persistence of high unemployment and the likely effects of economic reforms in the New Independent States. The study brought together researchers from four countries: Finland and the United Kingdom in the EU and Belarus and Russia in the NIS. The purpose was to examine the impact that differing labour standards in the two NIS countries and the two EU countries have and are likely to have on the ability of companies in each country to compete internationally. The core research activity comprised a small number of in-depth case studies of firms in the fertiliser sector, enabling comparisons to be made between the industries in each of the four countries. The lack of structure of labour markets in the NIS and their comparatively low labour costs posed a potential threat to the competitive position of the EU and this study set out to understand the relevant issues more fully from a number of different perspectives. These included comparing labour costs and productivity, social costs such as health and safety, pensions and other benefits and exploring the impact of investment on productivity. Ultimately the study focused on how a levelling up of labour standards in the NIS would impact on the EU Member States. This paper sets out the findings of the case studies within the fertiliser industries of the respective countries. These specific findings are presented within the general context of a comparison of labour market conditions. The fertiliser industry has been through a period of change in all four countries. Factors which emerge strongly from the research are the differences in health and safety standards and costs and environmental standards and costs between the NIS producers and the EU producers. Productivity also presents a very varied picture, with the NIS producers being disadvantaged by out-dated technology.
Publisher:
University of Wolverhampton
Issue Date:
Sep-1998
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/11413
Additional Links:
http://www.wlv.ac.uk/PDF/uwbs_WP015-98%20Walsh%20Leonard.pdf
Submitted date:
2007-04-26
Type:
Working Paper
Language:
en
Series/Report no.:
Working paper; WP 015/98
ISSN:
1363-6839
Appears in Collections:
Management Research Centre

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Kenneth-
dc.contributor.authorLeonard, Valerie-
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-26T14:13:44Z-
dc.date.available2007-04-26T14:13:44Z-
dc.date.issued1998-09-
dc.date.submitted2007-04-26-
dc.identifier.issn1363-6839-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/11413-
dc.description.abstractThe project which generated this paper arose from continuing concern in the European Union about the persistence of high unemployment and the likely effects of economic reforms in the New Independent States. The study brought together researchers from four countries: Finland and the United Kingdom in the EU and Belarus and Russia in the NIS. The purpose was to examine the impact that differing labour standards in the two NIS countries and the two EU countries have and are likely to have on the ability of companies in each country to compete internationally. The core research activity comprised a small number of in-depth case studies of firms in the fertiliser sector, enabling comparisons to be made between the industries in each of the four countries. The lack of structure of labour markets in the NIS and their comparatively low labour costs posed a potential threat to the competitive position of the EU and this study set out to understand the relevant issues more fully from a number of different perspectives. These included comparing labour costs and productivity, social costs such as health and safety, pensions and other benefits and exploring the impact of investment on productivity. Ultimately the study focused on how a levelling up of labour standards in the NIS would impact on the EU Member States. This paper sets out the findings of the case studies within the fertiliser industries of the respective countries. These specific findings are presented within the general context of a comparison of labour market conditions. The fertiliser industry has been through a period of change in all four countries. Factors which emerge strongly from the research are the differences in health and safety standards and costs and environmental standards and costs between the NIS producers and the EU producers. Productivity also presents a very varied picture, with the NIS producers being disadvantaged by out-dated technology.en
dc.format.extent134942 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Wolverhamptonen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP 015/98en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.wlv.ac.uk/PDF/uwbs_WP015-98%20Walsh%20Leonard.pdfen
dc.subjectNewly Independent statesen
dc.subjectBelarusen
dc.subjectRussian Federationen
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen
dc.subjectLabour standardsen
dc.subjectCompetitionen
dc.subjectFertiliser industryen
dc.subjectCase studyen
dc.titleThe effect on international competitiveness of differing labour standards in the fertiliser industry of the NIS and the EUen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.