University of Wolverhampton
Browse
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses > Business School > Management Research Centre  > Acts of faith: instinct, value and IT investment decisions

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/11368
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!



Title: Acts of faith: instinct, value and IT investment decisions
Authors: Bannister, Frank
Remenyi, Dan
Citation: Journal of Information Technology, 15(3): 231-241
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Issue Date: 2000
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/11368
DOI: 10.1080/02683960050153183
Additional Links: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713772733~db=all
Abstract: Although well over 1000 journal articles, conference papers, books, technical notes and theses have been written on the subject of information technology (IT) evaluation, only a relatively small subset of this literature has been concerned with the core issues of what precisely is meant by the term 'value' and with the process of making (specifically) IT investment decisions. All too often, the problem and highly complex issue of value is either simplified, ignored or assumed away. Instead the focus of much of the research to date has been on evaluation methodologies and, within this literature, there are different strands of thought which can be classified as partisan, composite and meta approaches to evaluation. Research shows that a small number of partisan techniques are used by most decision makers with a minority using a single technique and a majority using a mixture of such techniques of whom a substantial minority use a formal composite approach. It is argued that, in mapping the set of evaluation methodologies on to what is termed the investment opportunity space, that there is a limit to what can be achieved by formal rational evaluation methods. This limit becomes evident when decision makers fall back on 'gut feel' and other non-formal/rigorous ways of making decisions. It is suggested that an understanding of these more complex processes and decision making, in IT as elsewhere, needs tools drawn from philosophy and psychology.
Type: Article
Language: en
Keywords: Information technology
Decision Making
Value
Evaluation methods
ISSN: 02683962,14664437
Appears in Collections: Management Research Centre

Files in This Item:
File Description Size Format View/Open
Bannister & Remenyi.pdf95KbAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Fairtrade - Guarantees a better deal for Third World Producers

University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY

Course enquiries: 0800 953 3222, General enquiries: 01902 321000,
Email: enquiries@wlv.ac.uk | Freedom of Information | Disclaimer and copyright | Website feedback | The University as a charity

OR Logo Powered by Open Repository | Cookies