2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/107978
Title:
An Examination of Judging Consistency in a Combat Sport
Authors:
Myers, Tony D.; Nevill, Alan M.; Al-Nakeeb, Yahya
Abstract:
Two related studies compared the consistency of two different methods of interpreting and applying scoring criteria in Muay Thai that are normally used by officials in the UK and that are used by officials in Thailand. In the first study, levels of consistency were determined by comparing judge's scores (n=270) from forty-five bouts judged by UK officials and forty-five judged by Thai officials. In the second study the original forty-five bouts judged by UK judges were compared with forty–five bouts judged by UK officials using Thai judging criteria. Consistency was examined in both studies using two methods. The first method compared differences in the range of the highest vs. lowest points awarded by judges for each bout. The second method compared homogeneity of variance between judges' scores. Results suggested that the Thai officials were more consistent than their UK trained counterparts but also that UK judges were more consistent when adopting the Thai judging criteria. It was suggested that the use of very clearly defined criteria and concrete operationalization of otherwise subjective concepts used in applying the system used in Thailand was the main reason for the findings.
Citation:
Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 6(3)
Publisher:
bepress
Journal:
Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports
Issue Date:
2010
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/107978
DOI:
10.2202/1559-0410.1178
Additional Links:
http://www.bepress.com/jqas/vol6/iss3/3
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
1559-0410
Appears in Collections:
Learning and Teaching in Sport, Exercise and Performance

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Tony D.en
dc.contributor.authorNevill, Alan M.en
dc.contributor.authorAl-Nakeeb, Yahyaen
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-20T13:50:59Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-20T13:50:59Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 6(3)en
dc.identifier.issn1559-0410-
dc.identifier.doi10.2202/1559-0410.1178-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/107978-
dc.description.abstractTwo related studies compared the consistency of two different methods of interpreting and applying scoring criteria in Muay Thai that are normally used by officials in the UK and that are used by officials in Thailand. In the first study, levels of consistency were determined by comparing judge's scores (n=270) from forty-five bouts judged by UK officials and forty-five judged by Thai officials. In the second study the original forty-five bouts judged by UK judges were compared with forty–five bouts judged by UK officials using Thai judging criteria. Consistency was examined in both studies using two methods. The first method compared differences in the range of the highest vs. lowest points awarded by judges for each bout. The second method compared homogeneity of variance between judges' scores. Results suggested that the Thai officials were more consistent than their UK trained counterparts but also that UK judges were more consistent when adopting the Thai judging criteria. It was suggested that the use of very clearly defined criteria and concrete operationalization of otherwise subjective concepts used in applying the system used in Thailand was the main reason for the findings.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherbepressen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.bepress.com/jqas/vol6/iss3/3en
dc.titleAn Examination of Judging Consistency in a Combat Sporten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Quantitative Analysis in Sportsen
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.