2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/107541
Title:
Students and mobile devices
Authors:
Traxler, John
Abstract:
Many educators advocate, promote and encourage the dreams of agency, control, ownership and choice amongst students whilst educational institutions take the responsibility for provision, equity, access, participation and standards. The institutions traditionally procure, provide and control the technology for learning but now students are acquiring their own personal technologies for learning and institutions are challenged to keep pace. These allow students to produce, store, transmit and consume information, images and ideas; this potentially realises the educators’ dream but for institutions is potentially a nightmare, one of loss of control and loss of the quality, consistency, uniformity and stability that delivered the dreams of equity, access and participation. This paper traces the conflicting dreams and responsibilities.
Citation:
ALT-J, 18 (2):149-160
Publisher:
Routledge
Journal:
ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology
Issue Date:
2010
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2436/107541
DOI:
10.1080/09687769.2010.492847
Additional Links:
http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/09687769.2010.492847&magic=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3
Type:
Article
Language:
en
Description:
Author Posting. © 2010 Association for Learning Technology. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Association for Learning Technology for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in ALT-J, Volume 18 Issue 2, July 2010. doi:10.1080/09687769.2010.492847 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687769.2010.492847)
ISSN:
0968-7769
EISSN:
1741-1629
Appears in Collections:
Institute for Learning Enhancement (ILE)

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorTraxler, Johnen
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-13T13:52:13Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-13T13:52:13Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationALT-J, 18 (2):149-160en
dc.identifier.issn0968-7769-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09687769.2010.492847-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2436/107541-
dc.descriptionAuthor Posting. © 2010 Association for Learning Technology. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Association for Learning Technology for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in ALT-J, Volume 18 Issue 2, July 2010. doi:10.1080/09687769.2010.492847 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687769.2010.492847)en
dc.description.abstractMany educators advocate, promote and encourage the dreams of agency, control, ownership and choice amongst students whilst educational institutions take the responsibility for provision, equity, access, participation and standards. The institutions traditionally procure, provide and control the technology for learning but now students are acquiring their own personal technologies for learning and institutions are challenged to keep pace. These allow students to produce, store, transmit and consume information, images and ideas; this potentially realises the educators’ dream but for institutions is potentially a nightmare, one of loss of control and loss of the quality, consistency, uniformity and stability that delivered the dreams of equity, access and participation. This paper traces the conflicting dreams and responsibilities.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/09687769.2010.492847&magic=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3en
dc.subjectMobile devicesen
dc.subjectOwnership/agencyen
dc.subjectInstitutional procurementen
dc.titleStudents and mobile devicesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.eissn1741-1629-
dc.identifier.journalALT-J, Research in Learning Technologyen
All Items in WIRE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.